Summary

Medical education has undergone a significant transformation, driven by advancements in technology and the need for more efficient and effective training methods. While manikin-based simulation has long been the gold standard for clinical training, its resource-intensive nature has led to the exploration of alternative approaches.

Virtual simulations involve computer-based scenarios that replicate clinical situations through interactive software. These simulations can range from basic computer programs to advanced platforms that incorporate multimedia elements, such as videos, graphics, and interactive interfaces. Virtual simulations have gained popularity in medical education due to their flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to replicate diverse clinical scenarios. These simulations provide learners with opportunities to practice clinical decision-making, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills in a risk-free environment. In recent years, a wide variety of simulations have been developed.

Virtual Reality (VR) vs. Screen-Based Simulations

Virtual reality (VR) and screen-based simulations differ primarily in their level of immersion and interaction. Virtual reality creates a fully immersive environment by placing users within a computer-generated world through specialized headsets, enabling them to perceive and interact with a 3-D space as if it were real. This immersive experience includes head tracking and spatial sound, fostering a strong sense of presence. Screen-based simulations, such as traditional video games or simulations, are displayed on a 2-D screen and typically rely on keyboard, mouse, or controller inputs for interaction. While they offer visual and auditory engagement, they lack the same level of immersion and physical presence that VR provides, and instead offer a program that is less technologically complex and more familiar to users.

Virtual Reality (VR) Simulations

VR simulations take virtual learning to the next level by immersing learners in a fully digital environment through specialized VR headsets. These simulations aim to replicate real-world scenarios by creating a sense of presence, allowing learners to interact with objects and environments in a natural and immersive manner.

Effectiveness:

VR simulations offer an unparalleled level of immersion, enabling learners to practice skills in a highly realistic environment. They have been particularly valuable in training for surgical procedures, patient communication, and even addressing psychological conditions through exposure therapy.

Advantages:

• Realistic Immersion: VR simulations provide an immersive experience that closely replicates real clinical environments, enhancing the transferability of skills.
• Hands-On Training: Learners can perform procedures and tasks using virtual tools, mimicking real-world scenarios without risk to patients.
• Innovative Possibilities: VR enables the creation of innovative scenarios that may be challenging to replicate using traditional methods.

Limitations:

• Cost and Accessibility: VR technology can be costly to implement, including the expense of VR headsets and development of simulation content.
• Motion Sickness and Discomfort: Some users may experience motion sickness or discomfort when using VR, impacting the learning experience.
• Technical Complexity: Developing VR simulations requires specialized skills and ongoing maintenance.

Screen-Based Simulations

Screen-based simulations, also known as desktop simulations, occur on traditional screens such as computers, tablets, and smartphones. These simulations offer interactive experiences using multimedia elements, though they do not provide the same level of immersion as VR.

Effectiveness:

Screen-based simulations are well-suited for scenarios that require visualization, data analysis, and decision-making. They offer a practical and accessible way to engage learners in a wide range of medical contexts.

Advantages:

• Accessibility: Screen-based simulations are more accessible due to their compatibility with widely available devices.
• Cost-Effective: Developing screen-based simulations is generally more cost-effective compared to VR simulations.
• Familiarity: Learners are accustomed to interacting with screens, reducing the learning curve associated with new technologies.

Limitations:

• Limited Immersion: Screen-based simulations lack the depth of immersion provided by VR simulations, potentially reducing their effectiveness for certain skills.
• Less Realistic Experience: Interactions may feel less natural and lifelike compared to VR simulations.
• Reduced Engagement: Users might be more prone to distractions when using screen-based simulations.

The evolution of medical education has led to the exploration of various simulation methods to enhance clinical training. Manikin-based simulations have been the gold standard due to their hands-on nature and haptic feedback. However, resource intensity has prompted a shift towards virtual simulations that offer flexibility and cost-effectiveness. Within virtual simulations, the distinction between VR and screen-based simulations highlights the trade-offs between realism, accessibility, and immersion.

While VR simulations provide the highest level of realism and immersion, they come with technical complexity and cost considerations. Screen-based simulations offer accessibility and familiarity, making them suitable for certain skills and scenarios. As technology continues to advance, the interplay between these simulation methods will shape the future of medical education, providing a dynamic and evolving landscape for training healthcare professionals to provide high-quality patient care.

References

1. Chang, Todd & Gerard, James & Pusic, Martin. (2016). Screen-Based Simulation, Virtual Reality, and Haptic Simulators. 10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_9.

2. Gaba, DM (2004). The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13 (Suppl 1):i2–i10. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.009878

3. Gupta S, Wilcocks K, Matava C, Wiegelmann J, Kaustov L, Alam F. Creating a Successful Virtual Reality-Based Medical Simulation Environment: Tutorial. JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Feb 14;9:e41090. doi: 10.2196/41090. PMID: 36787169; PMCID: PMC9975916.

4. Jessica M. Phillips, Mary G. Harper, Holli A. DeVon, Virtual Reality and Screen-Based Simulation Learner Outcomes Using Kirkpatrick’s Evaluation Levels: An Integrative Review,
Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Volume 79, 2023, Pages 49-60, ISSN 1876-1399,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.008.

5. Sayed Azher, Amanda Cervantes, Caroline Marchionni, Keerat Grewal, Hugo Marchand, Jason M. Harley, Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Headset Virtual Reality and Screen-based Virtual Simulation Offer A Comparable Experience, Clinical Simulation in Nursing,Volume 79, 2023, Pages 61-74,ISSN 1876-1399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.009.

6. Jones, J.; Wilkins, M.; Caird, J.; Kaba, A.; Cheng, A. & Ma. I.W.Y. (2017). An experimental study on the impact of clinical interruptions on simulated trainee performances of central venous catheterization. Advances in Simulation,2 (5), DOI 10.1186/s41077-017-0038-1

7. Weaver, S.J.; Dy, S.M.; Rosen, M.A. (2014). Team training in healthcare: a narrative synthesis of the literature. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 359-372.

8. Wang Z, Liu Q, Wang H. Medical simulation-based education improves medicos’ clinical skills. J Biomed Res. 2013; 27(2):81–84.